下载此文档

GCC, LLVM Clang和Open编译器比较.doc


文档分类:IT计算机 | 页数:约6页 举报非法文档有奖
1/6
下载提示
  • 1.该资料是网友上传的,本站提供全文预览,预览什么样,下载就什么样。
  • 2.下载该文档所得收入归上传者、原创者。
  • 3.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
1/6 下载此文档
文档列表 文档介绍
GCC , LLVM/Clang , AMD piler Benchmarks For those interested by last week's articles on the AMD Bulldozer benchmarks of the GCC, Open64, and LLVM/pilers and the FX-piler tuning , but curious to know how the new LLVM/Clang and pilers perform on other processors, here's some new test results. These tests are looking at GCC , LLVM/Clang -RC1, and AMD pilers on Intel Sandy Bridge and AMD Shanghai hardware. The first release candidate of GCC , LLVM/Clang RC1 , and AMD Open64 were tested on these two non-Bulldozer setups. The CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS set outside of each test's default flags were specifying the march/mtume option to native for taking advantage of each system's native features. GCC was built with --enable-checking=release and LLVM was built with --enable-optimized and --disable-assertions , to mirror release builds. The piler was using the 64-bit binary provided by AMD. All other testing remained at the respective defaults. The AMD Shanghai setup was a dual AMD Opteron 2384 quad-core (octal-core total) system with 4GB of RAM and a SATA HDD. The Intel Core i7 Sandy Bridge setup had an i7-2630QM (quad-core with Hyper Threading), 8GB of RAM, and a Super Talent SSD. Both systems were running Ubuntu (x86_64) with the Linux kernel. Results for Open64 on Sandy Bridge were not available since the AMD-piler failed to build working binaries for

GCC, LLVM Clang和Open编译器比较 来自淘豆网www.taodocs.com转载请标明出处.

相关文档 更多>>
非法内容举报中心
文档信息
  • 页数6
  • 收藏数0 收藏
  • 顶次数0
  • 上传人yixingmaoj
  • 文件大小443 KB
  • 时间2017-02-24