GRE写作：专家指路,高分不愁.docx

http:// GRE 写作:专家指路,高分不愁以下就是专家对一个 GRE 写作题目的解读, 通过本文考生可以了解到 GRE 写作该如何下笔。下面, 就跟小编来看一看 GRE 写作:专家指路,高分不愁。“ Every individual ina society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the pelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position. ”照理说,这道题目不算太难。旧版 GRE 作文题库中就有一道和它极其类似的题目: "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual ina society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws." 一些考生感到万般纠结的是如何理解这道新 G 作文的写作指引(Instruction) ,也就是这句话: “ In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the pelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position ”,尤其是如何满足“ be sure to address the pelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position ”的要求,这的确是个问题。这句话最为明确的信息是: http:// 考生的这篇作文必须要采用两面兼顾的写法,也就是一贯倡导的 Issue 作文的“两面写”的策略。这是因为,这条写作指引讲得非常明白: 考生在对这道 Issue 题目提出自己的立场后, 还必须(Be sure to) 对可能被用来反驳(challenge) 自己立场的最有说服力的理由和(或) 例证做出回应。这实际是要求考生在作文中一定要论及反方立场,所以,必须两面写。如果考生这时在写作中采用俗称的“一边倒”的写法,就完全不符合该指引的要求了。在其官方网站上, ETS 同样清楚地强调,写作指引是考题的一部分,考生必须要依照写作指引的要求完成写作。所以, 对于“ be sure to address the pelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position