商学院外文翻译模板.doc

文献一: (宋体五号) 英文题目( 居中, Times New Roman 字体,三号加黑) 正文(英文不少于 10000 印刷符号, Times New Roman 字体,五号) 翻译一: (宋体五号,另起一页) 中文题目( 居中,黑体,三号加黑) 正文(中文不少于 2000 字,宋体,五号) 文献二: (宋体五号,另起一页) 英文题目( 居中, Times New Roman 字体,三号加黑) 正文(英文不少于 10000 印刷符号, Times New Roman 字体,五号) 翻译二: (宋体五号,另起一页) 中文题目( 居中,黑体,三号加黑) 正文(中文不少于 2000 字,宋体,五号) 请参照下面模板文献一: Research on Spillover Effect of Foreign Direct Investment 1. Introduction In recent decades, economists have begun to identify technical progress, or more generally, knowledge creation, as the major determinant of economic growth. Until the 1970s, the analysis of economic growth was typically based on neoclassical models that explain growth with the accumulation of labor, capital, and other production factors with diminishing returns to scale. In these models, the economy converges to steady state equilibrium where the level of per capita e is determined by savings and investment, depreciation, and population growth, but where there is no permanent e growth. Any observed e growth per capita occurs because the economy is still converging towards its steady state, or because it is in transition from one steady state to another. The policies needed to achieve growth and development in the framework of these models is therefore straightforward: increases in savings and investments and reductions in the population growth rate, shift the economy toa higher steady state e level. From the view of developing countries, however, these policies are difficult to implement. Low e and development levels are not only consequences, but also causes of low savings and high population growth rates. The importance of technical progress was also recognized in the neoclassical growth models, but the determinants of the level of technology were not discussed in detail; instead, technology was seen as an exogenous factor. Yet, it was clear that convergence in e percapita levels could not occur unless technologies converged as well. From the 1980s and onwards, growth research has t