THE CONSTITUTIONALISATION OF PRIVATE LAW:
Scotland
The Honourable Lord Reed(1)
Readers are reminded that this work is protected by copyright. While they are free to use the ideas expressed in it, they may not copy, distribute or publish the work or part of it, in any form, printed, electronic or otherwise, except for reasonable quoting, clearly indicating the source. Readers are permitted to make copies, electronically or printed, for personal and classroom use.
I suspect that most students of private law in Scotland would find the title above rather difficult to understand. The reaction of some might be to reflect that Scotland does not have any 'constitution', in the sense in which that expression is used in other countries: in other words, a legal document with some privileged status, guaranteeing fundamental rights. Others might react with the thought that constitutional law and private law are quite distinct subjects: when I was an undergraduate at Edinburgh University, for example, they were taught by separate departments, with what seemed to me to be different traditions and different habits of thought. Constitutional law, after all, was regarded by some as a rather soft-edged subject, concerned to a considerable extent with conventions, traditions and practices which did not constitute 'law' in the same sense as the black letter subjects taught under the aegis
私法的宪法化 来自淘豆网www.taodocs.com转载请标明出处.