下载此文档

切开复位内固定与微创经皮钢板治疗胫骨中下段骨折效果对比分析.doc


文档分类:医学/心理学 | 页数:约5页 举报非法文档有奖
1/5
下载提示
  • 1.该资料是网友上传的,本站提供全文预览,预览什么样,下载就什么样。
  • 2.下载该文档所得收入归上传者、原创者。
  • 3.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
1/5 下载此文档
文档列表 文档介绍
切开复位内固定与微创经皮钢板治疗胫骨中下段骨折效果对比分析
【摘要】目的:对比分析切开复位内固定与微创经皮钢板治疗胫骨中下段骨折的临床效果。方法:收集我院2011年10月-2013年10月期间诊治的胫骨中下段骨折患者60例作为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组患者各30例。对照组采用切开复位内固定治疗,观察组采用微创经皮钢板治疗,对两组患者的临床效果进行分析对比。结果:研究结果显示,%,所有患者均未发生感染;%,有4例患者发生浅表感染,%,观察组患者的治疗效果明显优于对照组(P<)。结论:与切开复位内固定治疗方法比较,微创经皮钢板治疗胫骨中下段骨折的临床效果更加显著,能有效提高骨折愈合率并降低感染率,值得在临床应用上推广。
【关键词】切开复位内固定;微创经皮钢板;胫骨中下段骨折
[Abstract] parative analysis of open reduction and internal fixation and clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of distal tibial fractures. Methods: in our hospital from 2011 October -2013 year in October during the treatment of distal tibial fractures in 60 patients as the research object, randomly divided into observation group and control group, 30 cases of patients in each group. The control group was treated by open reduction and internal fixation, the observation group was treated with minimally invasive percutaneous plate treatment, compared two groups
of patients with clinical effect. Results: the observation group, the total healing rate was 100%, all patients had no infection; control group total healing rate was %, with superficial infection occurred in 4 patients, the infection rate was %, the observation group patients was significantly better than the control group (P<). Conclusion: compared with open reduction and

切开复位内固定与微创经皮钢板治疗胫骨中下段骨折效果对比分析 来自淘豆网www.taodocs.com转载请标明出处.

相关文档 更多>>
非法内容举报中心
文档信息
  • 页数5
  • 收藏数0 收藏
  • 顶次数0
  • 上传人ktdmzug142
  • 文件大小0 KB
  • 时间2015-08-22