下载此文档

微创经皮与切开复位内固定治疗胫骨骨折的临床疗效比较.doc


文档分类:医学/心理学 | 页数:约6页 举报非法文档有奖
1/6
下载提示
  • 1.该资料是网友上传的,本站提供全文预览,预览什么样,下载就什么样。
  • 2.下载该文档所得收入归上传者、原创者。
  • 3.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
1/6 下载此文档
文档列表 文档介绍
微创经皮与切开复位内固定治疗胫骨骨折的临床疗效比较
[摘要] 目的比较微创经皮与切开复位内固定治疗胫骨骨折的临床疗效。方法选择该院胫骨骨折患者46例,随机分成微创组和传统组,每组各23例。根据Johner-Wuhs法对两组手术疗效、术中出血量、切口长度、手术操作时间、骨痂形成时间、术后观察时间进行对比研究。结果微创组与传统组相比较手术出血量少、切口长度短、手术操作时间短骨痂形成时间短、术后观察时间短、手术效果好。差异有统计学意义(P<)。结论微创经皮治疗胫骨骨折具有良好优势,治疗效果满意,值得推广。
[关键词] 胫骨骨折;微创经皮;切开复位内固定
[中图分类号] [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2014)05(c)-0059-02
[Abstract] Objective pare the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous and open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of tibial fractures. Methods 46 cases of patients with tibial fractures admitted in our hospital in recent 5 years were divided into minimally invasive group and the traditional group, 23 cases in each group. According to Johner-Wuhs method, the clinical efficacy, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, operation time, callus formation time, postoperative observation time of these two groups pared and studied. pared with the traditional group, the intraoperative blood loss of the minimall
y invasive group was less, the incision length was shorter, the operation time, callus formation time and postoperative observation time was shorter, and the effect of surgery was better, the differences were statistically significant(P<). Conclusion Minimally invasive percutaneous treatment for tibial fractures has good advantages, and the treatment effect is satisfactory, which is worthy of promotio

微创经皮与切开复位内固定治疗胫骨骨折的临床疗效比较 来自淘豆网www.taodocs.com转载请标明出处.

相关文档 更多>>
非法内容举报中心
文档信息
  • 页数6
  • 收藏数0 收藏
  • 顶次数0
  • 上传人jiaxidong_01
  • 文件大小0 KB
  • 时间2015-09-19
最近更新