合同诈骗罪和非罪判断原则及标准——基于和民事合同纠纷比较视野.doc


文档分类:论文 | 页数:约80页 举报非法文档有奖
1/80
下载提示
  • 1.该资料是网友上传的,本站提供全文预览,预览什么样,下载就什么样。
  • 2.下载该文档所得收入归上传者、原创者。
  • 3.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
1/80
文档列表 文档介绍
目录中文摘要···························································································I英文摘要··························································································II目录·····························································································III第一章导论····················································································1第二章合同诈骗罪概述····································································5第一节合同诈骗罪概念及其构成要件·················································5第二节判断合同诈骗罪与非罪的意义·················································9第三章合同诈骗罪与非罪的判断原则·················································11第一节刑法的谦抑性原则································································11第二节“定性与定量分析相结合”原则的标准····································17第四章合同诈骗罪与非罪判断的标准·················································24第一节罪与非罪的实质标准——社会危害性程度·································25第二节罪与非罪的法律标准——具体个罪的构成要件···························28第五章合同诈骗罪疑点及案例研究······················································34第一节两个基本问题的思考·····························································34第二节非法占有目的产生时间的认定················································36第三节民事欺诈与合同诈骗的区别···················································38结语····························································································40参考文献·························································································41III万方数据第一章导论一、选题背景近年来合同诈骗类型犯罪高发,成为学界与实务研究的一个热点,同样也成为一个难点,究其原因就是对于区分合同诈骗行为与单纯民事诈骗行为的衡量尺度没能完全达成一致。从刑法的精神看:一方面,刑法的谦抑性要求我们不能扩大对合同诈骗罪的打击范围,把原本属于民事欺诈的领域纳入合同诈骗罪的范围进行处罚;另一方面,刑法的明确性与严厉性又要求我们不能放纵合同诈骗犯罪而将之归入民事欺诈的范畴。从刑法的社会效果看:一方面,有效的打击合同诈骗罪有利于维护正常的市场经济秩序,从而保障经济的健康有序发展;另一方面有不能将所有民事合同的欺诈行为以合同诈骗罪进行处罚,因为这样做可能使人对刑法产生多度的畏惧,从而导致市场合同关系交易大量降低,有碍于市场经济的活力发挥。在这样一种双刃剑的情况下,如何把握好合同诈骗罪与非罪的标准,尤其是在一些重大复杂疑难案件中,对处于二者临界点的一些案件,怎样明晰界限、准确把握两者间的关系,极大考验着学界与实务界人员的理论功底与实践经验。二、选题意义(一)理论意义。刑法学与民法学之间的交叉地带历来是两大部门法学所共同关心与热衷的话题,尤其是伴随自然犯的犯罪圈缩小与法定犯犯罪圈的扩大,在严密刑事法网的过程中,经济类、行政类侵害法益的行为被大量犯罪化,在此过程中,经济类犯罪的民

合同诈骗罪和非罪判断原则及标准——基于和民事合同纠纷比较视野 来自淘豆网www.taodocs.com转载请标明出处.

非法内容举报中心
文档信息
  • 页数80
  • 收藏数0 收藏
  • 顶次数0
  • 上传人2890135236
  • 文件大小1.21 MB
  • 时间2019-02-22