socialequityinredevelopmentandhousingUnitedstatesandkorae王晓晓南京林业大学资料.ppt

SOCIAL EQUITY IN REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING —— UNITED STATES AND KOREA 美韩两国的再开发与住房领域的社会公平翻译 Translation U S law says that CDBG ’ s “ primary objective ”: is to benefit low and moderate-e people ;the only other allowable uses are to address “ slums and blight ” or to meet urgent needs. 美国的律法意为 CDBG 的主要目的:是使低收入和中等收入的人受益,唯一的其他允许使用要求是”贫民窟和荒芜之地”或以满足紧急需求。 U S in some ways, but it is more so in others. Middle-class households in that country are less likely to get benefits that middle-class Americans take for granted, particularly tax write-offs for mortgage interest payments. However ,redevelopment has often led to high-rise apartment buildings that are most affordable for middle-e households ,who can outbid many displaced households. Even in some of the rental public . 美国在某些方面是这样的,其他方面更是。美国中产阶级不太可能拿到他们应该拿到的,尤其是是税务注销按揭利息开支的好处。然而,更新在发展常常使得对于中等收入家庭来说, 高层公寓才是最可能买得起的,他们能出更高的价, 即使在一些公共租赁区域。翻译 Translation T he overall lesson seems to be that the two governments have attempted to improve social equity but that social equity remains a problem .The historical review shows several positive changes in policy direction, many of them due to political factors. Although the overall impression is of inconsistency, in part because of the sheer number of approaches and program revisions(only a few of which were discussed here),in general both countries have provisions for several dimensions of social equity. 所有的经验教训表明, 两国政府都试图改善社会公平,但在社会公平仍然是一个问题. 历史回顾表明在政策方向上,因为政策因素的原因都有了一些积极的改变。虽然总的印象是不一致,部分原因是许多方法和程序的修订(其中只有一小部分在这里讨论), 但是总的来说两个国家都对有关社会公平的几个方面做出了规定。 Abstract 摘要*A lthough he two countries of the United States and Korae are difficult in many ways,they have had some parallel experiences with urban have created policies designed to reform previous problems in such areas as forced relocation and lack of provision,of low – e article reviews the parallel history of each concerning urban