004《经济学家》读译参考之四：一个关乎标准的问题-烟草公司日子不好过.doc

004《经济学家》读译参考之四：一个关乎标准的问题-烟草公司日子不好过.docTEXT 4
A question of standards
一个关乎标准的问题
Feb 9th 2006
From The Economist Global Agenda
More suggestions of bad behaviour by tobacco companies. Maybe
也许，烟草公司对那些不良行为应多提点建议
ANOTHER round has just been fought in the battle between tobacco companies and those who regard them as spawn of the devil. In a paper just published in the Lancet, with the provocative title "Secret science: tobacco industry research on smoking behaviour and cigarette toxicity", David Hammond, of *Waterloo University[l] in Canada and Neil Collishaw and Cynthia Callard , two members of Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada, a lobby group, criticise the behaviour of British American Tobacco (BAT). They say the firm considered manipulating some of its products in order to (1) make them low-tar in the eyes of officialdom while they actually delivered high tar and nicotine levels to smokers.
烟草公司与那些视其为“魔鬼之子”的人之间刚刚又进行了新一轮的交锋。新 近出版的《柳叶刀》刊登了一篇题目颇具煽动性的论文《秘密科研一一烟草业 开展对吸烟行为和香烟毒性的研究》，作者是加拿大沃特鲁大学的戴维•哈蒙德 以及加拿大一个名为“无烟加拿大医师”游说团的两名成员尼尔•科里肖和衲
娅•加拉德。他们对英美烟草公司的行为提出了批评，称该公司拟对某些烟草产 品进行处理，企图让监督部门误以为其焦油含量低，而实际上这些产品仍会使 得烟民吸收高浓度的焦油和尼古丁。
It was and is no secret, as BAT points out, that people smoke low-tar cigarettes differently from high-tar ones. The reason is that they want a decent dose of the nicotine which tobacco smoke contains. They therefore *pull[2] a larger volume of air through the cigarette when they *draw on[3] a