我国新农村建设的模式选择.doc

我国新农村建设的模式选择

of rural drinking wat主、农地流转、农村自治”，寻求利益相关方的平衡点成为新农村建设的主流方向。
图2:2004年以来中央一号文件政策重心
二、中国新农村建设的艰难探索
在全面建设社会主义新农村政策的指引下，各地掀起了新农村建设的高潮，政府、企业、社会力量等都在探索新农村建设的理想模式。我们对2006年以来新农村建设的

of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
实践进行了研究，选取了山东诸城、华润希望小镇等两个典型案例进行剖析。
（一）过激的诸城
诸城“撤村并镇”运动概况
山东省诸城市作为“增减挂钩”的第一批试点，大刀阔斧的进行了“撤村并镇”，强势推动以消灭农村，消灭农民为取向的“新农村”运动。从2007年开始，诸城在全市开展农村社区化服务与建设，以两公里为服务半径，按照地域相邻****俗相近的原则，规划建设一系列新型农村社区。每个社区涵盖5个左右的村庄，并设有社区服务中心。
诸城模式有如下两个特点：
消灭农村。全市1249个行政村合并为208个万人社区，每个社区约1500户人；取消原有行政村农民集体组织，重新选举社区居民委员会。
消灭农民。改变农民的居住环境和生活方式，农民以宅基地补偿金购买城市商品房，从而使农民从土地中解放出来；提高农民的社保水平，但与城镇居民仍有差距

of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of the scope of protection, complete with warning signs, isolating network protection facilities
of rural drinking water sources, protection of drinking water sources in rural areas by the end of the delimitation of