论我国股东代表诉讼的司法适用.pdf

山西财经大学
硕士学位论文
论我国股东代表诉讼的司法适用
姓名:李丽华
申请学位级别:硕士
专业:经济法学
指导教师:吴春香
2011-05-25
论我国股东代表诉讼的司法适用

摘要
股东代表诉讼起源于英国,在美国、日本、德国以及我国台湾地区都被采
用和发展,并形成了相关的立法及司法例。股东代表诉讼制度的基本含义是在
公司利益受到侵害,公司拒绝或怠于起诉,股东以自己名义为了公司利益而起
诉的行为。我国在 2005 年《公司法》正式引入这一制度,从实体法的角度对提
起诉讼的原告资格、被告、请求前置程序以及请求豁免等方面进行了规定。股
东代表诉讼有其固有的特殊性,跨越公司法和民事诉讼法两大法律体系,既要
有实体法的规定,又需要程序法方面的保障。我国公司实体法对股东代表诉讼
规定的过于原则和粗略,程序法方面没有相应规定,照搬民事诉讼法的相关规
定又难免牵强和不合乎股东代表诉讼的基本理念。本文以公司法第 152 条关于
股东代表诉讼的相关规定为逻辑起点,以具体的立法及司法适用为主线,并辅
以股东代表诉讼的基础理论知识和国外相关的法例,最后得出相关的具体完善
措施。力求在保护股东利益和维护公司效率方面寻找最佳平衡点,在鼓励股东
提起代表诉讼和防止滥诉方面寻求适当措施。

【关键词】股东代表诉讼当事人前置程序诉讼费用





1
论我国股东代表诉讼的司法适用
Abstract
Shareholder’s Derivative Action originated the United Kingdom, in the United
States ,Japan ,Germany and Taiwan region of China have been adopted and development, and the
formation of the relevant legislation and judicial cases. Shareholder’s Derivative Action, the basic
meaning of infringement in the interests of pany, pany refused or delayed in
prosecution, on behalf of the shareholders in their own interests for pany to institute legal
proceedings. China in 2005, "Company Law" formal introduction of this system, from the
perspective of substantive law, the plaintiff sued qualifications, the defendant, request pre-process
and other aspects of the request for exemption requirements. But the shareholder lawsuit has its
inherent specificity, spanning the two major corporate law and civil law legal system, which
requires both the provisions of substantive law, procedural law and the protection needed.
Substantive law of pany on behalf of shareholders of the principles and actions required are
too rough, there was no corresponding provisions of procedural law, copy the relevant provisions of
the Civil Procedure Law and inevitably far-fetched and out of the basic concept of shareholder
lawsuit. In this paper, section panies Act lawsuit on behalf of the relevant provisions of the
shareholders as