下载此文档

APE与FLAC的简单比较.doc


文档分类:IT计算机 | 页数:约6页 举报非法文档有奖
1/6
下载提示
  • 1.该资料是网友上传的,本站提供全文预览,预览什么样,下载就什么样。
  • 2.下载该文档所得收入归上传者、原创者。
  • 3.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
1/6 下载此文档
文档列表 文档介绍
APE与FLAG的简单比较
Whether APE or FLAG is good or bad is always an eternal dispute in VC. I picked the following text from tlmost all operating system platforms. Its coding algorithm is quite mature, and has passed the rigorous test, still can play normally when the coding is damaged. In addition, the format is the first to obtain extensive hardware support lossless format, the world well-known digital products such as: Rio, hard disk Karma MusicKeg Walkman, car audio Kenwood and PhatBox digital player can support the FLAG format.
The flash chip Walkman is little lossless compression format support FLAG, but in recent days, the domestic well-known manufacturers of electric science and technology TL-T19 second generation dual core film MP3, has announced a lossless compression format support for FLAG, which is currently the first support FLAG lossless compression format of the film MP3, is currently the world one of the few supports FLAG music flash MP3.
As has already been shown, lossless compression is less compressed than audio files without ensuring that all the source files are lost. That is to say, the two audio formats guarantee the lossless rate of the source file. But the two compression formats are, after all, two compression algorithms. Here are some similarities and differences between the two
compression formats:
Same point:
First, the compression ratio determines

APE与FLAC的简单比较 来自淘豆网www.taodocs.com转载请标明出处.

相关文档 更多>>
非法内容举报中心
文档信息
  • 页数6
  • 收藏数0 收藏
  • 顶次数0
  • 上传人蓝天
  • 文件大小84 KB
  • 时间2022-05-20