人教版教材和苏教版教材比较.pdf

人教版教材和苏教版教材的比较中文摘要 I 人教版教材和苏教版教材的比较中文摘要 2001年《全日制义务教育语文课程标准(实验稿)》出台,很多教材应运而生,使用得比较广泛的是人教版义务教育语文实验教科书和苏教版义务教育语文实验教科书。两种风格不同的教材获得了比较高的评价,给人以耳目一新的感觉。教材真正进入使用阶段,困惑、不解随之涌现,专家、学者、老师都开始对两种教材进行分析、思考,发表了诸多见解。读着这些评价,结合笔者2005年一轮人教版和2008年一轮苏教版的教学实践,笔者发现两种教材虽然指导思想一样,但是取得的实际效果却不一样。本文从文本层面指出了人教版教材和苏教版教材中的四个不同:教材的结构呈现方式不同;学****内容的整合方式不一样;古诗文诵读方式不一样;名著阅读的推荐方式不一样。接着从使用层面对这些不同进行了逐一的分析,指出带来的使用效果的不同,判断哪一种方式更适合学生,更适合教学,更适合教育。两种教材都不可避免地存在着一些现实问题,面临着共同处境:教材是大语文,现实是小语文;和高中教材知识点上的脱节。教材的编写应该考虑参与的群体,考虑教材的理论和实践的完美结合,考虑给师生更多的发展空间。关键词:人教版教材苏教版教材比较分析现实困境路径选择作者:李美指导老师:陈霖 parison of Textbooks Between the People’s Education Press and Jiangsu Education Press parison of Textbooks Between the People’s Education Press and Jiangsu Education Press Abstract Once Full-pulsory Education English Curriculum Standard (Experimental Draft 2001) was released, varieties of textbooks sprang up like mushrooms, of which the ones published by the People’s Education Press and Jiangsu Education Press were widely used and well received. Both the two different types of textbooks are highly spoken of, for they are really a breath of fresh air in China’s current educational reform. After the textbooks were put into use in middle schools, puzzles plaints came , scholars, and teachers began to analyze and comment on the two types of textbooks, and conveyed their own views. Judging from ments and my personal teaching experiences, I realize that the two types of textbooks have reached different actual effect despite the same guiding principles. This thesis, based on the text aspect, points out four differences between the two types of textbooks, namely, the text structures, the text contents, the recite method of ancient poetry, and the mended reading strategies for ancient classics. And then the thesis moves on to the practical effectiveness the two types of textbooks bring about in terms of their usage so as to decidewhich way pilation is more approp