关于“费列罗案”的案例分析论文.pdf

中文摘要改革开放三十多年以来,随着我国社会主义市场经济逐步成熟,我国的商品经济得到了长足发展,涌现出了许多的知名商品,使我国的自主品牌在国际舞台上也有了强劲的竞争力。竞争是经济活动的常态,是商品经济的本质属性。正当的、有规则的竞争会给经济发展起到催化剂的作用,它要求竞争者之间必须地位平等,同时遵守公平、诚实信用的基本法则,但实践中,由于经济利益的巨大诱惑,有部分竞争者违反市场竞争原则,破坏了竞争的有序性。知名商品是混淆行为的最大受害者,目前我国对知名商品的法律保护,主要体现在《反不正当竞争法》中,但该法的规定比较宽泛,对细节问题的规定并没有很好的体现出来。所以,对知名商品及其法律保护的研究有重要的实践价值。不正当竞争行为中最为常见的侵权行为就是混淆行为,本文讨论的费列罗公司诉蒙特莎公司不正当竞争案就是混淆行为中擅自使用与知名商品近似的特有包装、装潢的典型案例。本文共分三个部分: 第一部分为案例简介,主要介绍涉案双方的背景和三级审理法院的审理结果及其依据。第二部分是法理分析,也是本文的重点,主要介绍与知名商品相混淆行为的四个构成条件;讨论什么是知名商品及其判定;论述知名商品的包装、装潢的特有性和地域范围问题:明确商品销售时间和在先知名的关系。第三部分是对本案侵权认定的思考。关键词:不正当竞争行为混淆行为知名商品在先知名 ABSTRACT Since the reform and open policy has been carried out for30 years,China’S socialistmarket economy hasgradually matured,and modity economy alsohas made emerges many well—modities,and italso makes our brand petitiveness intheinternational petition is mon intheeconomic activity,which istheessential attribute modity properandwell-petition willplay arolelikecatalyst inthe economic requires petitor must be intheequal status, ply withthebasiclaw offairness,honesty and inpractice,petitors violatetheprinciple petition,because ofthehuge economic well·modity isthebiggest victim ofconfusion in China,the legal protection ofwell-modities ismainly embodied inthe Anti—petition theruleisvery broad,the regulations on details are not reflected ,the research on thewell-modity and legal protection has the important and practical petition,the mon infringement behavior paper discusses atypicalcase of FERRERO about thiscase,confusion act expresses intheunauthorized packaging andupholstering ofwell-modity withtheapproximate characteristic. This paper hasthreeparts: The firstpart isbriefintroduction introduces thebackground oftheboth parties,the resultsandbasis ofthree-level trial. The second part islegalanalysis,and itisalsothekey ofthisp