消费者权益保护法案例分析.doc

消费者权益保护法案例分析
actively carry out the law on civil air defense education, drawn out of the air defense in Pingliaand regulation, overfulfilled the province upper and lower knots of up to 500,000 yuan fee collection tasks. 5, further standardize internal management, improve staff quality. Adhere to the
actively carry out the law on civil air defense education, drawn out of the air defense in Pingliang city Building under easy fare, daily special inspection and regulation, overfulfilled the province upper and lower knots of up to 500,000 yuan fee collection tasks. 5, further standardize internal management, improve staff quality. Adhere to the
法院在查询过程中，经技术监督局对A厂的冰箱和B公司的电源保护器进行质量判定，确定：〔1〕该品牌和类型的电冰箱线路连接上存在某些　缺点，通常情况下不会出毛病，在特定的情况下会适中发作高温；〔2〕电源保护器现已被焚毁无法判定，但对相同商品检测，没有发现质量问题；〔3〕原先赵在装置电源保护器与冰箱时，未按说明书正确装置，使保护器无法发扬正常效果，招致冰箱等物品被焚毁。
【剖析】
1、按照?消耗者权益保护法?的规那么，出售者可以先行进行补偿。但出售者无过失，不承担最终的补偿职责，如先行补偿，可向出产者追偿。
2、消耗者赵的产业损害，主要因出产者A厂的冰箱有缺点所形成的，出产者要承担产物职责。况且依?产物质量法?的需求，不管出产者有无过失，都适用“严厉职责准那么〞。
3、晓得保护器的B公司所出产的产物不存在缺点，赵的产业损害与保护器失效无关，因而不承担职责。
actively carry out the law on civil air defense education, drawn out of the air defense in Pingliang city Building under easy fare, daily special inspection and regulation, overfulfilled the province upper and lower knots of up to 500,000 yuan fee collection tasks. 5, further standardize internal management, improve staff quality. Adhere