《史记评林》文学价值的研究.doc

安庆师范学院
硕士学位论文
《史记评林》文学价值研究
姓名:范文静
申请学位级别:硕士
专业:中国古代文学
指导教师:汪祚民
2011-06-05
中文摘要
明代万历年间,由乌程人凌稚隆辑校的《史记评林》,广采万历四
年以前各朝各代《史记》研究的经典性文献,网罗上百家分属不同思
想流派的评点者之精华,其间渗透进凌氏本人的真知灼见,是一部近
代以前《史记》研究的集大成之作。
《史记评林》百三十篇的众多评点中潜藏着丰富的、极具文学色
彩的评点,然而今人尚未做过全面、深入的研究,《评林》的文学价值
未得到应有的彰显。
本文着眼于对《史记》文学性评点的提取。主要从《评林》评点
《史记》的字句用法、篇章结构和叙事特色入手,对《史记评林》的
文学价值作一个系统的研究。《史记评林》中存在不同评点者对同一文
本会作出不同的评价,以及不同评点者对不同文本却又存在大量相似
的评价,本文通过对这类评点的把握深入探求司马迁的创作真意,完
成从评点内容到文本创作的完整解析。
本论文着重引用西方叙事学理论,结合《史记》文本,论述《评
林》对《史记》叙述视角、非叙事性话语和叙事时间的研究,试图证
明中国的叙事学研究在明清时期既已成熟,并形成了一定的本土特色,
实不落后于西方的研究。
关键词:凌稚隆;《史记评林》;《史记》;评点;文学性
ABSTRACT
Comments on the Record of History, edited and proofread by
Lin Zhilong, a Wucheng native during the Wanli reign of Ming
Dynasty, is a canon crystallized with different schools of
historic thoughts before the fourth year of Wanli’s reign and
highlighted by the author’s own opinions, which justifies its
epithet “the encyclo-paedical research work on the Record of
History”.
However, there is hardly anyone in modern times who has never
made systematic research into the literary values of the 130
pieces of brilliant writings ments on the Record of History,
thus the glory of this masterpiece is eclipsed to some extent.
This thesis focuses on the summary of ments
concerning The Record of History, starting from the assessments
of diction and layout ments on the Record of History, and
making a systematic study of its literary values. Meanwhile,
it’s supposed to be pointed out that this very book contains
ments of different critics on the same version as
well as ments of different critics on the different
versions. All ments enable us to obtain a thorough
understanding of Sima Qian’s writing purpose and plete
analysis of mentary work.
This paper focuses on the Western narrative reference theory,
"Historical Records" text, ments on the Record of
History on the "Historical Records" narrative perspective, and
1
narrative non-narrative discourse of the time, trying to