下载此文档

合同法中显失公平与乘人之危的比较.doc


文档分类:论文 | 页数:约3页 举报非法文档有奖
1/3
下载提示
  • 1.该资料是网友上传的,本站提供全文预览,预览什么样,下载就什么样。
  • 2.下载该文档所得收入归上传者、原创者。
  • 3.下载的文档,不会出现我们的网址水印。
1/3 下载此文档
文档列表 文档介绍
合同法中显失公平与乘人之危的比较

Introduction:The argument that hoe of its conclusion, it endment or cancellation. Taking advantage of others is concluded in above situation. The point is ent, things on scenarios

Distinguishing grossly conscionable and take advantage of others could be significantly meaningful .Actually, taking advantage of others can be defined as an intentional fault, personal subjective conduct. On the other hand, a contract e of its conclusion, ply one partys subjective intention. So the unconscionable contract must result from some subjective factor that used by one party intentionally .For example, Mr. Chans factory only has one electrical electrical field. The manager of electrical field alanagers brother came to Mr. Chans factory and elon. Mr. Chan rejected this trade. After a feanager of electrical field called Mr. Chan and said that the factory anufacture if Mr. Chan doesnt accept the trade. Mr. Chan has no choice but accept it [1]. Furthermore, the consequence istake, each of the parties is entitled to petition the Peoples Court or an arbitration institution for amendment or cancellation of the contract. Hoendment or cancellation of the contract[2] .
Further analysis

According to above , it is necessary to recognize a case ergence , lack of experience in trade , ple , Mr. Zhang came from village and has no experience in being a uch less than market

合同法中显失公平与乘人之危的比较 来自淘豆网www.taodocs.com转载请标明出处.

非法内容举报中心
文档信息
  • 页数3
  • 收藏数0 收藏
  • 顶次数0
  • 上传人pppccc8
  • 文件大小57 KB
  • 时间2017-11-25